Timberlake Park dog ban proponents, opponents dig in ahead of city meeting

August 25, 2009

By Warren Kagarise

At left, Chuck Klein, a neighbor near Timberlake Park for 23 years, cleans an eye on Coby, his golden Labrador, after a walk. Above, a new local resident, who didn’t want her named published, walks her dog to the Lake Sammamish shoreline at Timberlake Park. By Greg Farrar

At left, Chuck Klein, a neighbor near Timberlake Park for 23 years, cleans an eye on Coby, his golden Labrador, after a walk. Above, a new local resident, who didn’t want her named published, walks her dog to the Lake Sammamish shoreline at Timberlake Park. By Greg Farrar

A sign at the entrance to Timberlake Park carries a stern warning to pet owners leading dogs down the leafy trail: “No Dogs Allowed.” Since the sign went up last month, however, pet owners have flaunted the dog ban.

City officials, eager to prevent safety mishaps at the park, responded in kind. Pet owners are now likely to encounter parks staffers or Issaquah Police officers, who tell them about the municipal ordinance that prohibits dogs in most city parks.

Timberlake Park, 24 acres nestled against the southern shore of Lake Sammamish, was open to dogs until earlier this summer.

City officials banned dogs after they received reports from people about dog waste littering the grounds, park goers getting knocked down by dogs and dogs fighting with each other.

“Our position at the city, of course, is safety,” Parks & Recreation Director Anne McGill said.

A series of incidents at the park were recounted in calls and e-mails to city parks staffers. McGill recounted a call from a mother at the park whose children could be heard crying in the background after a dog had knocked them down.

Officials described incidents in which wayward dogs snatched food from picnic tables and darted off park property into nearby backyards.

City officials will host a Sept. 9 open house to review pet rules and concerns about Timberlake Park.Since the ban was enacted, however, city officials have had to contend with vandalism at the park. A “No Dogs Allowed” sign was bent in late July, and a picnic table was torched in early August. McGill said it could not yet be determined if the ban was a factor in either incident.

The city acquired Timberlake Park, at Northwest Sammamish Road and 182nd Avenue Southeast, as part of the South Cove annexation.

After South Cove voters opted for annexation by Issaquah four years ago, city officials kept the old King County rules at Timberlake Park. Leashed dogs would be allowed unless officials received complaints about canine activity.

Dogs are banned in most city parks due to safety and sanitation concerns. Bark Park in the Issaquah Highlands is the only city off-leash dog park within city limits.

When the Timberlake Park ban was announced, city officials suggested pet owners walk dogs on city streets and trails, at Lake Sammamish State Park, at the Tradition Plateau Natural Resources Conservation Area and trails around Cougar, Tiger and Squak mountains.

Squak Mountain resident Connie Ramsey described the Timberlake Park ban as “overkill.”

“It’s like a mother who’s overprotective of her child,” Ramsey said. “It’s all well and good, but you have to live a little.”

Ramsey said she would occasionally take her 11-year-old Basenji mix, Mittens, to Timberlake Park. Ramsey said she carried a bag for dog waste with her, and put her dog back on a leash if she spotted other dogs or park goers.

Though she said other dogs at the park were well-behaved, Ramsey said she spotted dog waste on the park grounds. She said she could understand why nearby residents had issues with dogs in the park.

“I could see why people were so upset if dogs were getting close and running on their property,” Ramsey said.

Doug Spooner has lived along 184th Street Southeast, the narrow street adjacent to the park, for several years. Increased traffic as a result of park users has him riled.

“It’s a big pain in the butt that we didn’t have before,” Spooner said.

The lot at the Timberlake Park entrance has space for five vehicles and cars often overflow onto the street.

Spooner expressed ambivalence about the dog ban.

“Everybody has the right to do whatever they want as long as they don’t hurt anybody else,” he said.

Spooner, who opposed the South Cove annexation, bristled at officials’ decision to enact the dog ban.

“Most of us moved down here because it’s off the beaten path,” he said.

At the Sept. 9 meeting, city staffers will also review other cities’ rules about pets in parks. Staffers will collect feedback from open house attendees about how to ensure public safety at Timberlake Park.

Mayor Ava Frisinger, owner of a 12-year-old Corgi mix named Amadeus, said she could sympathize with pet owners’ concerns. In the days after the ban was announced, Frisinger received several calls and e-mails from residents who favored and opposed the ban. She said city officials looked forward to hearing options from residents about how to accommodate pet owners who oppose the ban and residents who favor the ban.

McGill emphasized the safety concerns behind the decision to ban dogs.

“We’re not going to wait until someone gets bit,” she said.

City Ordinance 1567

It is unlawful for the owner or custodian of any domestic animal to cause, permit or allow such animal to:

A. Enter any city park where posted; or

B. Enter in or upon any public fountain.

If you go

Timberlake Park pet rules open house

6:30-8:30 p.m. Sept. 9

Tibbetts Creek Manor

750 17th Ave. N.W.

Warren Kagarise: 392-6434, ext. 234, or wkagarise@isspress.com. Comment at www.issaquahpress.com.

Bookmark and Share
Other Stories of Interest: , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

5 Responses to “Timberlake Park dog ban proponents, opponents dig in ahead of city meeting”

  1. Connie Ramsey on August 26th, 2009 12:15 am

    In addition to my comments made in the above article, I want to add that I feel that Issaquah should NOT ban dogs from ANY Issaquah parks! All parks should allow dogs. We especially need a large park in the downtown core area just for dogs and their owners to play and run in, such as the off-leash area at Marymoor Park. I am so sick and tired of seeing “No Dogs,” “No Dogs,” “No Dogs” posted everywhere in this town.

    I hope everyone who owns a dog attends the Sept. 9 meeting at the Tibbetts Creek Manor – which, by the way, is next to another “No Dog” park. Maybe we should all bring our dogs to show support for the needs of “Man’s Best Friend” and their owners! Now that would be an interesting meeting!

  2. Doug on August 28th, 2009 1:13 pm

    As usual, it’s the five percent that don’t take responsiblity for what they do that makes everyone else suffer under blanket rules.

    Then again, maybe if you people that have to own dogs would have bought some real property instead of one of those tract homes with 20 square feet of lawn, those dogs would have some room to exercise and you wouldn’t have to drive the miles to find open space.

  3. Connie Ramsey on August 30th, 2009 7:46 pm

    To Doug above: My husband & I don’t have a “tract” home as the ones up in the Highlands area of Issaquah, but we also couldn’t afford five acres like my parents could back when I was growing up in Redmond. Does that mean I don’t have a right to owning a dog and having a public park to take a dog? For 13 years of home ownership in Issaquah I’ve paid taxes, as well as through buying retail items in this state throughout my lifetime . Those taxes help (I hope) in my use of city, county and state parks – and taking my pet(s) with me if I so choose. I’ve lived in many towns and cities in this state in my 50 years of life and have never seen one so anti-dog as Issaquah! (the government that is, not the people) So then, sir, if ONLY five percent of the people around here are not taking responsibility when they walk their pets, why is the city SO overreacting with all these “NO DOGS ALLOWED” signs?!?! Dogs are a part of many, many peoples lives. Maybe “you people” who DON’T own dogs don’t know what you are talking about!

  4. Sandy Snill on September 14th, 2009 2:20 pm

    Wow – what a horrible, backwards place. I’m glad I don’t live there. (Though where I live it’s not much better, but at least they haven’t banned dogs in public parks – yet.) Good luck to all of you people with dogs in fighting these asinine, self-appointed nannies.

  5. Sam on September 29th, 2009 6:00 pm

    I’ve taken three of my dogs over the years since 1988 to Timberlake Park. I always cleaned up after them and kept them leashed but they’ve always enjoyed swimming there. Make it an off-leash park for our pets. People can use the state park.

Got something to say?

Before you comment, please note:

  • These comments are moderated.
  • Comments should be relevant to the topic at hand and contribute to its discussion.
  • Personal attacks and/or excessive profanity will not be tolerated and such comments will not be approved.
  • This is not your personal chat room or forum, so please stay on topic.