Press Editorial

October 5, 2010

By Staff

Ballot measures target new, revised taxes

The November general election includes three tax initiatives that would purportedly raise or lower taxes in the future. It’s a convoluted array of ballot issues that says much about the unrest of these economic times.

• Vote no on Initiative 1107. The initiative asks voters to undo the sales tax increase on candy, gum, bottled water and carbonated beverages that legislators passed earlier this year and goes into effect in December. The tax is expected to raise $352 million for the state general fund. That isn’t enough to close the budget gap, but without it, education, social and health services will suffer more. The tax increase is not onerous enough to threaten anyone’s household budget. While legislators need to tweak some aspects of the new law, voters should not reverse it.

• Vote no on Proposition 1. King County is seeking voter approval of another 0.2 percent increase to the sales tax, with funds to go directly for the support of public safety and the courts, and construction of a new Youth Services Center. The county executive has proposed a county budget that reduces the sheriff’s department, taking officers off the street, and reduced funds for the court system. We’ve seen this kind of electoral blackmail before, preying on the fear of the people. Voters need to give Proposition 1 a resounding defeat, then step up and tell the County Council what other programs can be cut if police on the streets are a priority. We the people need to help the county get its priorities straight without giving in.

• Vote no on Initiative 1098. The initiative would establish a state income tax on families earning $400,000 annually while reducing state property tax levies and some B&O taxes. While we are not necessarily opposed to considering a state income tax in exchange for reductions of other taxes, I-1098 is the wrong way to go about it. Sadly, we just don’t trust that our legislators won’t lower the threshold for the income tax, letting that $400,000 ceiling creep down to the middle class it is intended to relieve.

Bookmark and Share
Other Stories of Interest: , , ,

Comments

One Response to “Press Editorial”

  1. Nick on October 6th, 2010 12:06 pm

    Wow did you do ANY research on initiative 1107? It is not a “sales tax” and it is already in effect, as opposed to you saying it “goes into effect in December.” If you can’t get these simple facts correct then I know your editorial is not worth the keystrokes it took to write it.

    Here’s the truth – these taxes were adopted at the last minute of a special session with NO public input. The money goes into the black hole of the general fund, there is nothing in that says it will go to education or health services. The state budget has increased 43% over the past 5 budgets. And finally this tax is poorly written and confusing as all get out – a snickers is taxed, but a twix is not. That’s sound public policy?!?!

    This is bad public policy rushed through at the end without any public input. I encourage everyone to provide public input on Nov. 2nd and VOTE YES!

Got something to say?

Before you comment, please note:

  • These comments are moderated.
  • Comments should be relevant to the topic at hand and contribute to its discussion.
  • Personal attacks and/or excessive profanity will not be tolerated and such comments will not be approved.
  • This is not your personal chat room or forum, so please stay on topic.