Press Editorial

February 14, 2012

By Staff

Heritage designation fits for greenway

It seems silly that different public land-use agencies cannot work together, but the Mountains to Sound Greenway Trust is trying to help resolve that problem.

Today, there are six major agencies that manage public lands with the 1.5 million acres known as the greenway. These include the U.S. Forest Service, City of Seattle Watershed, state Department of Natural Resources, Washington State Parks, the state Department of Fish and Wildlife, and King County.

The agencies should be able to intermingle land management. The benefit focuses on enforcement and environmental decisions. For example, one agency employee may not have the authority to stop hunters or timber cutting on public land. It also opens the doors to pilot projects that might be used elsewhere in the country.

The greenway trust is taking the suggestion of the U.S. Forest Service seriously and has begun the move of lands in the greenway to have a National Heritage Area designation. This would allow the jurisdictional management of 900,000 acres of public lands and 100,000 acres of privately conserved lands. The other half-million acres are already in use — your home and workplace — and would not be affected.

The national heritage designation has no federal price tag — it only opens a window of opportunity. And the designation does not intrude on property rights, not adding new regulatory authority or other management restrictions over private lands.

It does not require any property owner to provide public access to their land and it does not affect water rights or fishing and hunting regulations.

The greenway trust has reached out to U.S. Rep. Dave Reichert for help in getting the designation. It couldn’t be better timing. Reichert is also making a push to get legislation passed in support of the Alpine Lakes Wilderness Area. While the Alpine Lakes are not within the greenway boundaries, Reichert’s passion for protected public lands should extend to both.

Bookmark and Share
Other Stories of Interest: , , , ,

Comments

2 Responses to “Press Editorial”

  1. David Baty on February 15th, 2012 6:37 pm

    Unless convinced otherwise, I don’t think the Mountain to Sound Greenway organization should take over for all the other groups mentioned. It seems logical, but the greenway trust seems to favor preserving land over preserving recreational opportunities of all types. It is a bad idea to move all these public lands closer to a national park model in the form of a heritage site. Not everyone wants or even benefits from substantial amounts of public land to look like a national park that you hike around. Sure, they have their place, and an important one at that, but it is not right for every parcel of public land.

  2. Gordon on February 27th, 2012 4:30 pm

    Article: “While the Alpine Lakes are not within the greenway boundaries”
    While not all of the Alpine Lakes Wilderness is within the boundaries, some of the area is! See this map: http://mtsgreenway.org/explore-the-greenway

    David: “Unless convinced otherwise, I don’t think the Mountain to Sound Greenway organization should take over for all the other groups mentioned.”
    The organization won’t take over for the other groups and it won’t mandate any kind of changes in what types of recreation can take place. See: http://mtsgreenway.org/designation/what-heritage-areas-will-and-will-not-do

    Cheers

Got something to say?

Before you comment, please note:

  • These comments are moderated.
  • Comments should be relevant to the topic at hand and contribute to its discussion.
  • Personal attacks and/or excessive profanity will not be tolerated and such comments will not be approved.
  • This is not your personal chat room or forum, so please stay on topic.