Press Editorial

March 20, 2012

By Staff

Public not engaged in redevelopment plan

The city of Issaquah has come a long way toward adopting a Central Issaquah Plan, a blueprint for a future Issaquah with buildings up to 150 feet tall, more people and traffic, and more commercial buildings combined with multifamily residential units.

Meetings begin this month and continue into May to hear public comment.

Sadly, only the usual suspects are likely to speak up. Developers and landowners, the Issaquah Chamber of Commerce and members of the Issaquah Environmental Council will be there — but few others. It doesn’t need to be that way.

When Issaquah wrote its Comprehensive Plan nearly three decades ago, a facilitator reached out to neighborhood groups, churches, clubs, sports organizations and more to walk them through a visioning process that helped write and preserve the characteristics of Issaquah that citizens hold dear.

Three years ago, the community packed Pickering Barn as participants sketched out possibilities for Issaquah. It was one of a series of evenings that got people enthused to dream big. Alas, those ideas seem to be shelved.

Last year, a mayor-appointed task force took a low profile while it waded through the implications of what a new plan should look like. It’s the basis of what is now coming before the Planning Policy Commission and the City Council.

We are rightly concerned that the general public will be absent from the upcoming meetings as the Central Issaquah Plan is discussed. It’s just more than the average citizen can bite off to be able to comment with knowledge. It will take a more engaging process if city leaders really want public input.

In an effort to call your attention to the plan via signs and a website, the Issaquah Environmental Council has launched Eyes on Issaquah, a campaign to encourage citizens to take a closer look. But that effort is independent of the city.

There is no rush to get the Central Issaquah Plan adopted. There are reportedly no developers waiting in the wings for its guidelines. Getting input from citizens should be the first priority.

Bookmark and Share
Other Stories of Interest: , , , , ,


One Response to “Press Editorial”

  1. Lauree Naval on March 22nd, 2012 3:37 pm

    Your opinion can and does set the stage for our citizens and reflects the level of expertise of the Issaquah Press.

    I find your comment “the usual suspects,” demeaning to those of us that have made the commitment to be involved. The professionals, the experts, the activists, the passionate, and the knowledgeable? Everyone is welcome and always has been.

    This opinion did not reflect one insight of how the city has invited the public for comment. It is straight up government bashing and nothing more.

    Eyes on Issaquah talks to the money and how expensive this will be, who will pay? The market drives what is built: when, where, and how much. The city creates only the guidelines, the market does the rest.

    I believe the building limit is 125 ft., PPC meetings began a year ago, the general public was represented by everyone that attended every meeting, shelving ideas is the job of the CIP and bringing to light the best it can be.

    The CIP”s “Guiding Principles: Protect the Environment, Add Housing, Create a Sense of Community, Improve Mobility, Surround Central Issaquah with Green Space, Enhance Economic Vitality, and Innovate?

Got something to say?

Before you comment, please note:

  • These comments are moderated.
  • Comments should be relevant to the topic at hand and contribute to its discussion.
  • Personal attacks and/or excessive profanity will not be tolerated and such comments will not be approved.
  • This is not your personal chat room or forum, so please stay on topic.