I-522 spurs opinions about genetically modified food

October 15, 2013

By Peter Clark

November’s ballot initiative to label genetically modified food has caused a large split between local action and out-of-state funding.

Initiative 522 will ask voters whether the state should enforce labeling on genetically modified foodstuffs when sold in Washington.

“This measure would require most raw agricultural commodities, processed foods, and seeds and seed stocks, if produced using genetic engineering, as defined, to be labeled as genetically engineered when offered for retail sale,” the Nov. 5 ballot reads.

The question has stirred the state on both sides of the Cascades, and Issaquah residents and leaders have taken to the issue.

Sen. Mark Mullet, an Issaquah resident, came out in favor of the initiative, and held an event at his Ben & Jerry’s franchise with ice cream brand co-founder Jerry Greenfield last month.

“I support it,” Mullet said. “This is just trying to make people make more informed decisions. And if enough states start labeling it, then maybe it will all catch on.”

He said his experience in the state Legislature and abroad has allowed him a perspective that places him confidently in favor of GMO labeling.

“I got both sides in Olympia,” he said. “Having lived in Europe for five years, I view this as a very soft thing. This is just letting customers make better choices.”

State Rep. Chad Magendanz, also from Issaquah, joined the other side of the fence in opposing the measure. He is still waiting for research that justifies the concern.

“I absolutely support warning labels for foods that represent serious health risks for consumers, such as those containing alcohol, tobacco or common ingredients that can trigger severe or life-threatening allergies,” Magendanz said. “However, during our hearing on I-522 this session, I heard no independently verified research showing foods made from genetically modified organisms represents a serious health risk for anyone. In fact, the required label says nothing about what’s actually in the food and instead focuses only on how it was produced.”

He said he had additional worries that the labeling might prove harmful to a fragile economy.

“I also have serious concerns with how I-522 would be implemented at the state level,” he said. “Most labeling requirements are determined at the federal level so that farmers, processors and packaging facilities have just one set of rules to follow for the entire country.

“By adding burdensome packaging requirements that apply just for our state, we’ll drive production costs up, increase exposure to frivolous lawsuits and ultimately drive smaller brands out of our state, and that’s not good for the consumer in an economy where everyone is more price sensitive.”

Activism for the measure has proven more vocal and visible in Issaquah. Volunteers with signs and information in support of I-522 worked Salmon Days while the opposition was nowhere to be seen.

Local resident Dawn Remington is very passionate about the effects she has found genetically modified foods to have on health and economics. She has taken it upon herself to try working with local leaders and retailers to spread information that lists supposed harmful effects from the agriculture practice.

“Unfortunately, there is a huge segment of our population that do not have an understanding of the destructive effects of GMO grown foods,” Remington said. “Appallingly, United States citizens are less informed than outside countries. Japan, South Korea refused our Washington wheat farmers wheat crop this year because they found GMO wheat in their purchase. Many European countries are banning GMO grown foods.”

She said she believes similar initiatives in other states have failed due to the spread of mistruths by the opposition.

“People and corporations who make money off these destructive seeds, ‘debunk’ or mock the truth, as ‘conspiracy theories’ and/or confuse the issue so that our citizens do not know what to believe,” she said. “Well, I can tell you for certain, that what I have learned about these horrific GMO practices, is the truth.”

Funding for I-522 opposition has raised eyebrows in Washington state, both because it has broken the record for most money collected against a voter initiative and because all but $350 of the $17 million was donated from out-of-state entities.

Bookmark and Share
Other Stories of Interest: , , , , , ,

Comments

One Response to “I-522 spurs opinions about genetically modified food”

  1. Robbier5 on October 28th, 2013 12:18 pm

    Why are these corporations spending so much money on this election because it’s not just about Labeling our foods its all the about the creation and production of GMO foods. If you have access to Netflix there is a movie called “Genetic Chile” I would recommend you watch before you make a decision about voting for or against. I know if it passes it does not solve the real problems I believe GMOs might cause us all in the future but it gets it out in the open for further discussion.

    There is so much we don’t know about the safety or risks of GMO foods and anyone who says that’s not true is only basing their opinion on hearsay information. For myself I would love to learn more about specific scientific studies that would prove it either way. The government hasn’t performed a single detail study that I can find that can be referenced but relied on the word of major corporations as to their safety to give their approval.

    I agree there are two sides with every major issue but when one side will spend so much money to shut down the other sides views and concerns without allowing them to honestly share them with the public so they can make up their own minds.

Got something to say?

Before you comment, please note:

  • These comments are moderated.
  • Comments should be relevant to the topic at hand and contribute to its discussion.
  • Personal attacks and/or excessive profanity will not be tolerated and such comments will not be approved.
  • This is not your personal chat room or forum, so please stay on topic.